CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
At this week's Third International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment, researchers reported that circumcising men can help protect them from contracting HIV. The study is the first that used the procedure specifically to prevent infection.
Bertran Auvert of the French National Research Agency INSERM and colleagues tested more than 3,000 uninfected men ages 18-24 in South Africa's Guateng Province. Thirty-two percent of adults in the province are HIV-positive. Some of the men were circumcised at the start of the trial, while others underwent the procedure after 21 months. At the trial's conclusion, researchers recorded 69 cases of HIV infection; only 18 of these were among men who were circumcised at the outset of the study.
"It shows that the intervention [circumcision] prevented between six and seven out of 10 possible infections," Auvert said, noting this his team's results were consistent with those of earlier observational studies in India and some African countries. The effect has been especially noticeable in certain parts of Africa where some groups of men are routinely circumcised while other nearby groups are not.
The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS responded in a statement: "Although the trial shows promising protective effects of adult male circumcision in reducing HIV acquisition, UNAIDS emphasizes that more research is needed."
Anticipating that demand for the operation may soon increase, the World Health Organization is developing guidelines to help qualified medical personnel perform it safely. Health officials have expressed concern that increased demand might raise the number of operations performed by traditional healers and that improperly performed circumcisions might actually increase the risk of infection. They also worry that less condom use and more risky sex could occur as a result of a false sense of safety and decreased sensitivity in the circumcised penis.
Because the foreskin is covered in cells that HIV seems to be able to infect easily, researchers believe removing it makes infection less likely. In addition, HIV may survive better in the warm, wet environment found beneath the foreskin. (Reuters)
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
AOC says this is why Marjorie Taylor Greene turned on Trump
November 05 2025 6:20 PM
6 historic gayborhoods you should visit in 2026 that are still thriving
November 05 2025 3:40 PM
Cole Escola, Jennifer Lawrence, and Emma Stone are making a Miss Piggy movie
November 05 2025 2:00 PM
20 hilarious & brutal memes celebrating Dems crushing MAGA in the election
November 05 2025 1:50 PM
This small Pennsylvania town just elected the state's first-ever out transgender mayor
November 05 2025 1:19 PM
Virginia farm owned by the 'Gardening Gays' was vandalized with medical waste and human feces
November 05 2025 1:19 PM
LGBTQ+ young people are politically engaged — but it's complicated
November 05 2025 12:00 PM
Spectacular Republican losses prove MAGA's transphobic playbook doesn't win elections
November 05 2025 11:38 AM
Trending stories
Recommended Stories for You

































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes