The Nevada Board
of Pharmacy on Thursday began hearings on a
controversial proposal that would permit pharmacists in the
state to refuse to fill a prescription that violated
their moral or religious beliefs. Under the proposed
regulation, pharmacists could refuse a prescription if
they notify their employer in writing in advance, arrange
"without delay" for another pharmacist to fill the
prescription, and decline to discuss the reason for
refusing the prescription. An attempt earlier this
year in the legislature to pass the regulation was
defeated.
Supporters say
pharmacists should not be compelled to dispense drugs that
conflict with their moral beliefs. "Nobody tells a physician
he has to perform an abortion," said Louis Ling, board
general counsel. "No other health care professional is
forced to do something over her beliefs."
But opponents say
pharmacists should not be able to deny patients
medicines that are prescribed by their doctors. They
question how patients in isolated rural towns with
only one pharmacy would be protected if the measure
passed. Pat Elzy, spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood
in Reno, said her group wants assurances that patients will
not have to travel to another town to get medicine.
Lisa Lynn
Chapman, 37, opposes the regulation. When she was 18 a Las
Vegas pharmacist refused to fill the birth-control
prescription Chapman needed for a health problem that
resulted in a hysterectomy. "It would be very easy for
somebody to make a moral assertion about AIDS drugs
and, using that same moral assertion, to discriminate
against somebody because they needed AIDS drugs," said
Chapman.
Eleven states are
considering bills that would protect pharmacists who
refuse to fill birth-control prescriptions. Four states
currently have such laws in place. (AP)