A group concerned
about several race-based incidents wants the Boulder,
Colo., city council to pass an ordinance it says will
prevent hate crimes from slipping through the cracks
of the legal system. "We want the city of Boulder to
demonstrate, not just with rhetoric but with action,
that it takes these kinds of crimes seriously and take some
ownership over the situation," said Bill Cohen,
spokesman for Community United Against Hate.
Civil libertarians say the idea may go too far
because it does not require an assault but could even
be used to prosecute someone for speech. 'We should
prosecute the action, not the thought, not the intent,
not the speech," said Carla Selby, former chairwoman of the
Boulder American Civil Liberties Union chapter.
A Boulder man, Philliip Martinez, is facing
prosecution under the state's hate-crime law for
allegedly assaulting a University of Colorado student,
Andrew Sterling, because of his race, breaking his jaw.
Colorado law bans ethnic intimidation, which can be
used in cases in which assault likely was driven by
racial, religious, or other prejudice.
Cohen said the law needs to be broadened so that
less-violent incidents are punished with longer
sentences, perhaps by prosecution in municipal court.
For example, a suspect accused of writing graffiti could be
given a longer sentence if the writing appeared to be
the result of racial or ethnic prejudice. It also
would cover physical or mental impairment or sexual orientation.
Selby said graffiti is a good example of why
this would be a bad law. "You can't enhance the
penalty because someone wrote something you don't
like." The proposed ordinance will be discussed by the
city's Human Relations Commission on Monday night.
(AP)