Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Trump’s FCC targets LGBTQ+ television content. GLAAD sounds alarm

The agency, led by Brendan Carr, is reconsidering TV ratings for “gender identity themes,” prompting warnings about free speech and cultural control.

truck displaying brendan carr censorship czar with four women in orange shirts that says the same thing with their mouths taped and sunglasses on

Activists gather as a mobile billboard truck accusing FCC Chair Brendan Carr of censorship is seen outside the FCC Headquarters in Washington, DC on March 26, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images for Free Press

A new federal inquiry into television ratings is drawing sharp backlash from LGBTQ+ advocates, who warn it could mark a turning point in how the government treats queer representation in media.

The Federal Communications Commission, led by Chairman Brendan Carr, this week opened a public comment period on whether existing TV ratings should be revised to account for what the agency describes as “gender identity themes.” The move, outlined in a formal public notice, asks whether parents are being adequately informed when children’s programming includes discussions of gender identity and whether additional labeling or higher ratings may be warranted.


Related: Having Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner isn’t a peace offering. It’s a contradiction

The notice points to the current ratings system, developed in the late 1990s, and questions whether it still provides “accurate and sufficient information” for families navigating a media environment that now spans broadcast, cable, and streaming platforms. It asks whether content descriptors should be expanded and whether the framework should apply more uniformly across platforms.

To critics, the inquiry reads more like a targeted intervention than a routine update.

GLAAD, the country’s largest LGBTQ media watchdog, responded with a warning that the effort risks singling out queer lives as inherently suspect. In a statement, GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said the proposal reflects a familiar political logic: that LGBTQ visibility requires special scrutiny.

“Parents should absolutely have a say in what their kids watch, and parents already know that seeing an LGBTQ person on screen or in real life does no harm,” Ellis said. “What does cause harm is government overreach.”

Ellis pointed to demographic realities often absent from such debates, noting that 23 percent of Americans under 30 identify as LGBTQ+ and that more than 5 million children are being raised by LGBTQ+ parents. “Media companies must be allowed to create and broadcast stories that reflect one-quarter of their audience without interference from a government agency with its own anti-transgender political agenda,” she said.

Related: TV stations were forced to air vile anti-trans, homophobic ads so graphic they got on-air content warnings

Related: LGBTQ+ people’s safety has plummeted across social media platforms: report

At this stage, the FCC has not proposed a rule change. The inquiry is an opening move, a request for public input that could, depending on how the agency proceeds, lead to formal revisions of the ratings system. Still, the questions it poses are unusually specific, focusing in part on whether shows rated TV-Y, TV-Y7, or TV-G should carry additional warnings when they include gender identity content.

“Americans should make their voices heard by submitting a comment that rejects this latest attempt by Brendan Carr’s FCC to manipulate the media, erode freedom of speech, and harm LGBTQ Americans,” Ellis said.

The announcement comes at a particularly fraught time for transgender people whose mere existence has become a flashpoint across American institutions. State legislatures have moved to restrict how gender identity is discussed in schools and libraries. Conservative advocacy groups have increasingly targeted media companies over inclusive programming.

“This is about more than television,” Ellis said. “It’s about whether a government agency gets to reshape culture, limit storytelling, and undermine free expression.”

FROM OUR SPONSORS

More For You