Issue Number 1008 | Open Book | Advocate.com Open Book  |  | Advocate.com

||  Summer Movies  ||
 
Open Book
Chuck Palahniuk writes stories that fearlessly expose the darkest parts of the human experience. So why is it that when it comes to his sexuality there are still some things he likes to keep hidden?
From The Advocate  May 20, 2008
Open Book

This is where the stillborn babies and dead children go,” whispers Chuck Palahniuk. We’re in the children’s tower, a five-story shaft in the massive Portland Memorial Mausoleum, one of Palahniuk’s favorite landmarks in Oregon’s largest city. Under the glow of a distant skylight, a cherubic fountain tinkles away in the center of the room, ringed by pink marble nameplates that stack impressively, tragically, out of view. In cubbies, on small shelves, parents have left flowers and windup toys. Members of the city’s Cacophony Society -- a group dedicated to what Palahniuk, a former participant, describes as “experiential potlucks” -- once visited the tower and, he says with characteristic delight, “wound up all the toys and released them at the same time.”

Spend enough time with Palahniuk and you come to expect these kinds of statements, this delivery: genuine wonder mixed with a wicked black sense of humor. We wander the corridors of the cavernous mausoleum, surrounded by countless shelves, and Palahniuk pauses in front of an open vault shrouded by a curtain. “They say the worst sound in the world is when they take a casket out of its berth and, as it tips, the entire liquefied contents rush to the lower end. Just bones and formaldehyde.” He tests a doorknob at random -- he tests all the doorknobs -- and when one turns, he strides into an empty, unlit storage room. “Sometimes this is where they hold the indigent bodies,” he says. “They put them in plastic-lined cardboard boxes, and you’ll go in and all the boxes will be collapsed onto each other.” 

The gigantic, maze-like mausoleum (“popular for suicides,” attests Palahniuk) served as a key setting for his book Survivor, and he used to write here, in one of the many empty sanctuaries or one of the dank-looking armchairs that are scattered around. “I would just find a big one, one that didn’t stink so much,” he says with a shrug. “They’ve had water problems for years.” Fifteen years ago Palahniuk even brought his partner here on their first date. The Cacophony Society had staged a scavenger hunt inside the mausoleum and he, along with a hundred others, came dressed in mourning black, carrying calla lilies. “We just got lost, absorbed into the building. You couldn’t hear another person at all,” he says. And his partner? “Oh, he hated it.”

This tour of the mausoleum is the first interview Palahniuk has ever granted to the gay press; his sexuality has previously been either largely unknown or the subject of endless rumor. But I sense no apprehension during our time together. A former machinist, Palahniuk moves with athletic purpose, as if we need to be somewhere. He’s thin and thoughtful, drives a red pickup truck, and wears a black

T-shirt that reads disappointed in Disney font. Praise comes easy to him -- praise for other authors, for his mentor and writing teacher Tom Spanbauer, for people with obsessions and passions. And with his company comes a strange -- though, as I would learn, not absolute -- sense of permission, as though no subject matter were out of bounds: the utility of carrots as dildos or the artifacts found on the floors of sex clubs. “I feel a comfort and absurdity and freedom that comes in the face of life,” he says. “No mistake will last forever -- all those bad or good choices you made, you’ll still end up here.”

A bright nihilism pervades Palahniuk’s risky, propulsive novels -- including Fight Club, Choke (which has been made into a feature film due out August 1), and his latest, Snuff, about the making of the world’s biggest gang bang. But for all their excessive situations and willful transgressions, these whiplash entertainments capture a poignant (if extreme and predominantly male) search for new forms of social interaction. “All my books are about a lonely person looking for some way to connect with other people,” Palahniuk writes in Stranger Than Fiction, his collection of nonfiction. “People want to see new ways of connecting. See How to Make an American Quilt or Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood. Of course, they are all women’s stories. We don’t see a lot of models for male social interaction. There’s sports and barn raisings. And now fight clubs,” a phenomenon Palahniuk invented and one that persists.

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: La Cucaracha
    Date posted: 2008-06-06 5:14 PM
    Hometown: Austin

    Comment:

    Fred, Palahniuk doesn't have anything to do with any websites, they are independantly run according to him. I saw him at an event for Snuff last night and he implied that the internet is a waste of everyone's time. Billy, I think that perhaps he just wants to keep private. If people print misleading things about him, then they're not scratching at the truth. When people print real things, close things about him, that's another matter. I don't understand why nobody values privacy anymore. It's bizarre.


  • Name: La Cucaracha
    Date posted: 2008-06-06 5:14 PM
    Hometown: Austin

    Comment:

    Fred, Palahniuk doesn't have anything to do with any websites, they are independantly run according to him. I saw him at an event for Snuff last night and he implied that the internet is a waste of everyone's time. Billy, I think that perhaps he just wants to keep private. If people print misleading things about him, then they're not scratching at the truth. When people print real things, close things about him, that's another matter. I don't understand why nobody values privacy anymore. It's bizarre.


  • Name: Billy
    Date posted: 2008-05-23 8:00 AM
    Hometown: Toronto

    Comment:

    It seems to me that Austin Bunn was just a good journalist doing what a good journalist does. They investigate and do their homework. Never assume the facts or take anyone on their word, no matter who they are for the risk of looking as foolish as the previous journalists that did. Palahniuk threw a tantrum over the Valby/Entertainment Weekly incident and almost seemed to panic by doing something he never does, and quite frankly seems to go entirely against his nature, and posted an audio rant on his website as a preemptive strike and denunciation. But when a previous journalist prints a blatantly incorrect factoid stating he had a wife, something entirely opposite to his actual sexuality he zips his lips and says nothing...it makes no sense. Because if it were the other way around, if he was straight and it was printed that he was gay and living with a partner, you can bet that reporter and the paper or magazine would have been corrected if not sued.


  • Name: Fred Wemyss
    Date posted: 2008-05-12 3:32 AM
    Hometown: Huntington, NY

    Comment:

    For what it's worth, I think Palahniuk's pulling out of the photo shoot was a response to THE ADVOCATE's lack of trust in him. If Austin Bunn really believes Palahniuk "doesn't remember being interviewed for the Q&A" on the official Palahniuk webite, why did he call the webmaster "to figure out who crafted his answer to the Q&A?" I think it would be natural for Palahniuk to assume Austin Bunn was trying to catch him in a lie. Granted, Palahniuk should have expected a reporter to try to catch him in a lie; I daresay he did expect him to try that. I'll even grant that Palahniuk is posing as an injured party. (By the way, I found the link to your article through a user comment on his site.) But if THE ADVOCATE, in its turn, does not expect the subject of an interview to distance himself when his sincerity is not merely questioned, but checked, I suggest THE ADVOCATE spend some time trying to prove who's straight.


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.